Thursday, May 8, 2014

An "I Couldn't Help Myself" Mock Draft

Waiting for the draft to start is pure torture, so I went ahead and redid my mock. Just because.


MOCK DRAFT RD. 1


1. Houston Texans – JADEVEON CLOWNEY, DE South Carolina

2. St. Louis Rams – GREG ROBINSON, OT Auburn

3. Jacksonville Jaguars – JOHNNY MANZIEL, QB Texas A&M

4. Cleveland Browns – SAMMY WATKINS, WR Clemson

5. Oakland Raiders – MIKE EVANS, WR Texas A&M

6. Atlanta Falcons – KHALIL MACK, OLB Buffalo

7. Tampa Bay Buccaneers – AARON DONALD, DT Pittsburgh

8. Minnesota Vikings – BLAKE BORTLES, QB Central Florida

9. Buffalo Bills – JAKE MATTHEWS, Texas A&M

10. Detroit Lions – ANTHONY BARR, OLB UCLA

11. Tennessee Titans – JUSTIN GILBERT, CB Oklahoma St.

12. New York Giants – ZACK MARTIN, OT Notre Dame

13. St. Louis Rams – HA HA CLINTON-DIX, S Alabama

14. Chicago Bears – CALVIN PRYOR, S Louisville

15. Pittsburgh Steelers – TAYLOR LEWAN, OT Michigan

16. Dallas Cowboys – TIMMY JERNIGAN, DT Florida St. 

17. San Francisco 49ers (via BAL) – ODELL BECKHAM JR., WR LSU

18. New York Jets – ERIC EBRON, TE North Carolina

19. Miami Dolphins – RYAN SHAZIER, OLB Ohio St.

20. Arizona Cardinals – BRADLEY ROBY, CB Ohio St.

21.Green Bay – C.J. MOSLEY, ILB Alabama

22. Philadelphia Eagles – KYLE FULLER, CB Virginia

23. Kansas City Chiefs – DARQUEZE DENNARD, CB Michigan St.

24. Cincinnati Bengals – KONY EALY, DE Missouri

25. San Diego Chargers – MARQISE LEE, WR USC

26. Cleveland Browns – TEDDY BRIDGEWATER, QB Louisville

27. St. Louis Rams – DEMARCUS LAWRENCE, OLB/DE Boise St.

28. Carolina Panthers – BRANDIN COOKS, WR Oregon St.

29. New England Patriots – LOUIS NIX III, NT Notre Dame

30. Baltimore Ravens (via SF) – JU’WUAN JAMES, OT Tennessee

31. Denver Broncos – JASON VERRETT, CB TCU

32. Seattle Seahawks – XAVIER SU'A-FILO, OG UCLA


Draft Resources


I am crazy and I like having my rankings in front of me while I watch the draft. These are the things I print out and have in my lap as teams are on the clock. If you want to step into my shoes and see what my draft experience is like here are some things you can print out to help you follow along.


This will keep your mind on the draft. It's like a game. Take good notes.

This is good for the mid-rounds when teams will get away from strict best player available drafting to fill needs.

The one that rules them all.


Tuesday, May 6, 2014

Movin' On Up: Potential Draft Day Trades

Mocking the Trade

I’m not going to do this for every team, but seeing that I am a 49ers fan and that the likelihood the 49ers actually draft at pick No. 30 is fairly slim, I’m going to do some mock trades.

First, here is a link to the traditional pick value chart that has been in use for decades. It has a convenient calculator feature to, so you can whittle away precious minutes (or hours) of your life dreaming up new trade scenarios if you’d like.


That chart is a good resource, but it’s not the be-all and end-all for draft day trades. A lot of teams use different charts, especially now that the salary structure for draft picks has changed due to the new CBA. In fact, one of the teams that doesn’t use this chart is the 49ers, as TrentBaalke outlines here.

(But you’ll notice he does say that every team at least references the traditional pick value chart. It’s like the Rosetta Stone of pick value charts. Everyone recognizes it.)

I think it’s safe to say that the 49ers’ draft value chart values mid and late-round picks higher than the traditional chart. I have reached this conclusion based on the evidence:

A) Team President and Baalke-sidekick Paraag Marathe is big on new-era metrics and statistical analysis and most “advanced analysis” trade value charts place much more value on mid-round picks than the traditional one (as you can see here).

B) Baalke is notorious for stockpiling picks. He trades away talented players like Cam Johnson for 7th rounders habitually, and the last two seasons we have been among the top two teams in the number of overall draft picks heading into the draft. He clearly sees value in having picks, probably because he values lower picks more than a typical GM.

C) The Eric Reid trade-up. On the traditional draft value chart the 18th overall pick is worth 900 points, while the 31st and 74th overall picks have a combined worth of 820 points. That 80 point differential is worth a Round 4 pick based on the traditional chart, not something an NFL decision maker is likely to just give up in a trade. However, on the Harvard Chart (provided in point A) the combined value of picks No. 31 and 74 is 324.2, which is actually worth more than the 8th overall pick.

The 49ers’ draft value chart probably splits the difference between the traditional and the new-age value charts.

I'm definitely not the only person to reach this conclusion. ProFootballTalk beat me to it a few days ago...Even though I wrote this post like a week ago (as you can tell by the lack of inclusion of the Ravens as a potential trade partner, which is like the flavor of the week among beat writers and draftniks alike. No-originality havin' little bitches...).

My tantrum is over and so is my preamble, let’s get to the mock trades!


1) The Monster Trade-Up

I can think of only four prospects the 49ers would consider moving up into the top-12 for; Sammy Watkins, Mike Evans, Justin Gilbert and Anthony Barr.

Scenario A: 49ers give up Nos. 30, 56, 61 & a 2015 First Round Pick [approx. 500 pts.] for the Raiders’ No. 5 overall selection.
The 49ers select Sammy Watkins.
(traditional value chart: 49ers totals = 1,752, Raiders totals = 1,700)

Scenario B: 49ers give up No. 30, 56, 61 & a 2015 Second Round Pick [approx. 250 pts.] for the Buccaneers’ No. 7 overall selection.
The 49ers select Mike Evans
(traditional value chart: 49ers totals = 1,502, Buccaneers totals = 1,500)

Scenario C: 49ers give up No. 30, 56 & 61 for the Detroit Lions’ No. 10 overall selection.
The 49ers select Justin Gilbert.
OR
The 49ers select Anthony Barr.
(traditional value chart: 49ers totals = 1,252, Lions totals = 1,300)

I personally just don’t see this happening. Maybe if we were the clear cut leader in our division now and into the foreseeable future and we needed to get over the Super Bowl hump, but with the impending battle with the Seahawks (and Cardinals and Rams) for the NFC West now and into the next decade I don’t think we can afford to give up the impact and depth all those top-100 picks would have on the roster for a single player. I’m just not of the opinion that even a player I love like Sammy Watkins is the little boost we need to consistently beat the Seahawks.


2) The Moderate Trade-Up

There is a litany of prospects the 49ers could consider moving up 6-12 picks for. I won’t even name them all. Use your imagination. I’ll provide a couple examples for guys I would like them to trade up for.

Scenario A: The 49ers trade picks Nos. 30 & 77 for the Dolphins’ No. 19 pick.
The 49ers select Marqise Lee.
(traditional value chart: 49ers totals = 825, Dolphins totals = 875)

Scenario B: The 49ers trade Picks Nos. 30 & 94 for the Bengals’ Nos. 24 & 199 picks.
The 49ers select Kyle Fuller.
(traditional value chart: 49ers totals = 744, Bengals totals = 751.8)

These are the two most likely scenarios in my mind. With the Eagles, Chiefs, Chargers and Panthers all needing receivers, and the Cardinals, Eagles, Bengals, Chargers and Saints all looking for cornerbacks, it would make a ton of sense for the 49ers to use some of their draft capital and go and get “their guy” at one of those positions instead of waiting to see who falls in their lap.

I think the Dolphins are a likely trade partner. They are in the range where it wouldn’t be overly costly to trade-up, and we would leap frog most of the major competition for prospects we are likely to target. Plus, the Dolphins could very well be looking to move back. They have multiple holes on the offensive line and deficiencies on both sides of the ball. Moving back to select Joel Bitonio or Xavier Su’a-Filo at pick 30 and adding additional talent in the Third Round would probably be an excellent strategy for them as well.


3) The Trade Down

It’s not likely to happen in my opinion, but if the 49ers can’t find a partner to trade up with and they don’t have a prospect at No. 30 they feel is worth the pick, they could look to trade down and pick up extra picks to have even more flexibility in the middle rounds, or add picks in the 2015 draft.

The Texans, Jaguars, Raiders, Vikings, etc. could be looking to move back up into Round 1 to take a quarterback like Teddy Bridgewater or Jimmy Garoppolo or A.J. McCarron.

Scenario A: The 49ers give up No. 30 for the Raiders’ No. 36 & a 2015 Third Round pick [approx. 100 pts.].
The 49ers select Jordan Matthews.
OR
The 49ers select Jason Verrett.
(traditional value chart: 49ers total = 620, Raiders totals = 640)

Scenario B: The 49ers give up No. 30 for the Vikings’ No. 40 & 96 [from Seahawks].
The 49ers select Davante Adams
OR
The 49ers select Keith McGill.
(traditional value chart: 49ers total = 620, Vikings totals = 616)


There You Have It

A little exercise in draft day trades. We are all smarter now.


Sunday, May 4, 2014

A Mock Big Board? Say Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaat

from thefinsiders.com


I can’t do anything without a lot of context, backstory and a generally verbose preamble. So here’s like 1,500 words to preface an experimental re-ordered big board.

Jesus Christ...

So as I said I’d do in my “Being Trent Baalke” piece, I’ve made a new, re-ordered draft board with the grading system I outlined in that post. It is 50 players, and some of the top prospects in the draft are completely absent because they are players the 49ers simply aren’t going to draft due to the fact they are bad fits for our scheme.

Speaking of scheme fit, this board is trying to take that into account. To make a board based on scheme fit I obviously had to make a decision as to what scheme the 49ers run. Simple right?—It’s a 3-4 obviously.

Well…yes and no. They actually run a lot of “4-3 under,” which looks like a 3-4, but is run much more like a 4-3 in terms of each defenders role and responsibilities.

It’s why Glenn Dorsey is a perfect nose tackle for our scheme even though he couldn’t man the nose in a more traditional 3-4. It’s because he isn’t really playing a true 0-tech NT position, but more of the 1 or 3-technique he was so great at while playing college ball for LSU.

And it’s why Ahmad Brooks has been such an impact player for us since the arrival of Vic Fangio. The college middle linebacker is no longer playing out of position as a traditional 4-3 OLB, but more often like a 4-3 SAM linebacker.

Still, we do ask our players to run out of a traditional 3-4 set sometimes, and ask them to handle the responsibilities of traditional 3-4 defenders. This is one of the reasons I value versatility so highly in my personal draft grades—almost all teams play some sort of hybrid scheme nowadays.

To be a key contributor to the 49ers’ front seven you need to have the body type associated with the 3-4 prototype, but be able to handle the responsibilities associated with a 4-3 defender. This makes scouting the front seven incredibly difficult for an outsider such as myself. But I do my best.

In coverage we play a fairly vanilla off-man Cover-2 most of the time. We throw in a good amount of press-man Cover-1 and even a little single high safety Cover-3, but when scouting defensive backs it’s best to think of them as fitting into our predominantly used Cover-2.

49ers cornerbacks must have the ability to stick their foot in the ground and drive hard on the ball. Other highly valuable traits are hip fluidity, route recognition and length. Speed is important of course, but a cornerback with average speed can succeed in our defense because there is often a safety on the hash over the top ready to bear down on receivers running vertical routes.

Being able to react and drive on slants, curl and comebacks is more important than being able to keep up step for step with a receiver running a streak. Once again—awesome if they can do that—but you don’t sacrifice hip fluidity and lower body explosion for long speed.

Length (height and arm length) is important too, because it forces the quarterback to throw the ball “over the top” of the cornerback, which gives the safety an added split second to make a play on the ball or the receiver. Or it forces the quarterback to throw the ball high and on a line for the receiver to make a play on in the air, which gives the safety a target area to unleash the fury on.

Safeties in our system have to have three qualities, in this order; intelligence, speed and physicality. But those are pretty much the top-3 qualities for safeties in any scheme. We aren’t drafting a safety in the first round anyway, so enough about them.


Before I reveal the board, let me give you one example of how I grade cornerbacks for our scheme (because we will be drafting one or two cornerbacks early on in this draft).

I’m going to compare the two big-bodied cornerbacks in this draft—Stanley Jean-Baptiste and Keith McGill—and make the case for why I think McGill would make a better 49er that Jean-Baptiste.

McGill is a Cover-2 cornerback. Stanley Jean-Baptiste is a Seahawk/Jaguar-esque Cover-3 cornerback.

McGill has the necessary lower body power and explosion to drive to the ball in off-coverage. His 4.18 20-yard shuttle is evidence of that, putting him at 10th among all defensive backs at the Combine. McGill was one of three cornerbacks 6’0” or above (he was actually the only above) to rank in the top-10 in this drill, along with Antone Exum and Marcus Roberson. The 20-yard shuttle tests for the ability to stop momentum and accelerate—basically what is asked of cornerbacks when they transition from a backpedal to driving forwards to a ball in the air.

McGill’s excellent balance and lower body explosion was also evident when he measured the second longest broad jump among all defensive backs, trailing only Pierre Desir. The vertical jump generally gets more attention, but most scouts will tell you the broad jump is the more important of the two, because it tests the entire body. Balance and coordination is tested as well as pure lower body explosion.

He clearly has the length to play in the system (he has the length to play in any system at 6’3”) and he actually is “longer” than Jean Baptiste because McGill’s 33 ¼ inch arms are slightly longer than Jean-Baptiste’s 32 3/8 inch arm.

McGill is the superior quick twitch athlete and has better lateral movement skills than Jean-Baptiste. He is much more suited to an off-man scheme than Jean-Baptiste, who is more of a linear athlete with build-up speed on vertical routes.

Jean-Baptiste fits the Seahawks cover-3 impeccably, possessing better ball skills than McGill, and having an impressive vertical jump to go with his height and long speed. In the Cover-3 Jean-Baptiste would have help underneath as opposed to over the top, so his responsibility is to stay over the top of the receiver and not get beat deep, while also needing to play the intermediate and deep ball in the air, which he is fantastic at, being a former wide receiver.

Both have flaws; neither is as physical as you’d want from overly large cornerbacks, both are older than your typical rookie and both are raw and undeveloped on technique and footwork.

But both have ridiculous potential. They have size and speed and athleticism. I just feel McGill’s type of speed and athleticism translates much better to the 49ers’ scheme than Jean-Baptiste’s particular brand of speed and athleticism. So that will be reflected in their grades on this big board.

For further reading about what kind of defensive scheme(s) the 49ers run under Vic Fangio I recommend these two articles as starting points:



I’m also going to mention briefly that on offense the 49ers use a power-man blocking scheme. So bigger, more physical offensive lineman were at a premium over light-footed technicians for the purposes of this board.

from nyusportsandsociety.org

Quarterbacks were also graded partly on Bill Parcells’ “QB Criteria” for grading quarterbacks (go here for the 7 “musts” a QB has to haveaccording to Parcells). I know Jim Harbaugh plays a huge role in evaluating and grading quarterbacks for the 49ers, so the other part of the grade comes from what he looks for in a quarterback, part of which is outlined here in an interview with Matt Barrowsof the Sac Bee.

Obviously I don’t have Jim Harbaugh’s instincts, but I can try to identify the football smarts and athleticism he covets. I also know he prefers height and big hands, but I can’t find the article that backs that up, so you’ll just have to trust me on this one.

Of the top QBs, you should know this info for their Parcells QB Criteria (italics for criterion not met):

Teddy Bridgewater: 3 year starter, 35 starts, 27 wins, 3 : 1 TD to INT, 68.4 completion %, Junior, earned Sports Administration Degree.

Blake Bortles: 3 year starter, 27 starts, 22 wins, 2.9 : 1 TD to INT, 65.7 completion %, Junior, did not graduate.

Johnny Manziel: 2 year starter, 25 starts, 19 wins, 2.8 : 1 TD to INT, 68.9 completion %, Sophomore, did not graduate.

Derek Carr: 3 year starter, 39 stars, 24 wins, 4.7 : 1 TD to INT, 66.7 completion %, Senior, earned Recreation Administration and Leisure Services Management.


And without further ado…





Friday, May 2, 2014

2014 NFL Draft Big Board Release Party

You're invited!

My Disciples, I give to you ... This Big Board

We are six days away from the 2014 NFL Draft. After months of grueling “work” and thousands of words blurted into the abyss of cyberspace or soaked up by your eyeballs, it is time to finally unveil the holy grail of pre-draft analysis: The Big Board (insert angelic chorus here).

This is the culmination of doing so much online scouting that when I open up YouTube it’s nothing but highlight football videos of various college players from the SEC to Conference USA. When I type in the letter “T” into my google address bar it doesn’t pull up Twitter, but a drop-down list of suggestions for “Trent Baalke,” “Teddy Bridgewater,” “Taylor Lewan,” “Travis Swanson,” “Tyler Larsen” and “T.S. Eliot” (because I do have some other interests).  

This is the granddaddy of them all, the alpha and the omega, the one and only, the pinnacle, the summit, the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow, the long drink of water at the end of a desert trail.

It’s also fundamentally flawed by its very nature—and not only because it’s made by a guy that does all his scouting in front of a keyboard and monitor.

I’ve alluded to this before, but I should also have this disclaimer immediately preceding the Big Board itself, so here it is: I do not do my scouting with a specific scheme in mind, but based on the impact I expect the prospect to have in the NFL. This means that for my Big Board to work teams need to pick players that fit their schemes, and not play them out of position (thus limiting their impact).

For example, heading into the 2008 draft Glenn Dorsey was widely considered the top available defensive tackle prospect, with many evaluators projecting him as the next great 3-technique. As the 5th overall selection, he was drafted in line with these lofty expectations, but put into a system that did not take advantage—at all—of his skills as a penetrating interior pass rusher, and was asked instead to play the 5-technique in a 3-4, which he was not suited for. (He was still pretty good at that spot despite the horrendous fit, which just goes to show that he’s a pretty solid overall football player).

Was Glenn Dorsey worth the 5th overall pick? Yes, but not if you’re going to play him completely out of position.

Is Jadaveon Clowney worth the 1st overall pick? Yes, but not if the Texans plan to make him a 5-technique in their 3-4.

Is Kony Ealy worth a top-20 selection? Yes, but probably only if he will be playing 4-3 defensive end.

Because I have no actual team with no actual scheme to draft for my big board represents overall value as I see it in the class. But I have no control over the situation players ultimately end up in, so my board is fundamentally flawed.

Teams’ boards, while taking into account overall talent, also largely take into consideration scheme fit for their particular team (or they should, in theory) and I simply can’t do that. I can only project what position a player would fit best at, and then hope that an NFL team makes the same evaluation and plays him at that position.

Anyway, I hope that in three years I can get this board printed as a plaque to put on the wall of my new office at 4949 Centennial Blvd, where I will have earned a job as Trent Baalke’s protégée based on his incredulity than I NAILED the 2014 NFL Draft as an armchair GM…

But more than likely I’ll seem like a genius on about 10% of these evaluations, a complete idiot on 25% and somewhere in between on the other 65%.

Which is probably in line with the average NFL GM if we are being honest. (Ha Ha…)


And here it is brothers and sisters. Go 49ers.


(click to enlarge)